February 24, 2010

Alternative Treatments, Vacations, and the FMLA

Many people these days are seeking alternatives to standard medical treatments, many of which do not involve licensed physicians. Do those treatments qualify family medical leave under the FMLA? And what if the treatments are taken in such a way that they basically constitute a vacation?

No and no, says a federal district court in Massachusetts. It is an open question if this case affects Georgia employment law, but it is certainly of interest.

Continue reading "Alternative Treatments, Vacations, and the FMLA" »

January 11, 2010

FMLA’s 1250- Hour Requirement and Pre- Leave Retaliation

In order to be able to take an unpaid leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), you have to have worked 1250 hours over the previous year. Seems simple enough, right?

Not so fast. Figuring in overtime, flex time, commute time, home office time, and everything else can make for a complicated formula. A recent 3rd Circuit decision brings up some very interesting questions about how to calculate that hourly mark.

Continue reading "FMLA’s 1250- Hour Requirement and Pre- Leave Retaliation" »

May 17, 2009

Additions to FMLA Proposed in Congress

Two bills were recently introduced into the United States Congress that, if passed, would have an important effect on the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA). Taken together, they would both expand the current effect of the bill and roll back some of the restrictions that the previous administration’s had imposed on that law.

Under the FMLA, which passed into law in 1993, employers must grant a leave (unpaid) of up to twelve weeks every twelve months for certain family emergencies and other medical conditions.

The Bush administration had imposed some restrictions on the FMLA which Rep. Carol Shea-Porter (D-N.H.) has proposed to eliminate in H.R. 2161, which she has called the Family and Medical Leave Restoration Act. The restrictions were posted in a November 2008 DOL final regulation.

Continue reading "Additions to FMLA Proposed in Congress" »

March 18, 2009

Family and Medical Leave Updated Poster

The U.S. Department of Labor recently updated its basic informational poster to reflect changes in the Fair Labor Standards Act, including the new military family leave entitlements enacted under the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, as well as changes in the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), all of which took effect on January 16th.

The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) provides certain employees with up to 12 weeks of unpaid, job-protected leave per year. It also requires that their group health benefits be maintained during the leave.

You can view the new poster here:


Continue reading "Family and Medical Leave Updated Poster" »

December 11, 2008

Grandfather Eligible for Leave to Care for Newborn Grandchild under FMLA

Under the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), a parent is entitled to take FMLA leave for the birth or care of a newborn child. An interesting twist on this issue was recently addressed by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals (the federal appeals court with jurisdiction over the federal district courts of Florida, Georgia and Alabama) in Martin v. Brevard County Public Schools: whether a grandparent who is the primary caregiver of his grandchild is eligible for FMLA leave. In a terrific decision, the Eleventh Circuit decided in favor of the grandparent.

In the case, the employee had several children who lived with him, one of whom gave birth to a baby while the employee worked for a public school district. The newborn came to live with the employee and the employee provided substantial financial support to the child; the child’s biological father did not live with the child. When the baby’s mother was called up for military service, the employee applied for FMLA leave to care for the newborn, claiming that he stood “in loco parentis” (in the place of the parent) and that he was needed to care for the baby. Although the employer initially approved the FMLA leave, it terminated the employee before his 12-week leave was exhausted. Also, the mother of the baby never actually left for military service, but the employee continued to care for and provide for the newborn.

In response to the employee’s FMLA action, the employer argued that the employee did not stand in loco parentis, and the district court granted the employer’s motion for summary judgment. On the employee’s appeal, the Eleventh Circuit reversed, holding that because the employee provided substantial care and financial assistance to the newborn, the fact that the newborn’s mother was still in the employee’s home and provided care to the baby, did not change the fact that the employee was, for all practical purposes, acting as a parent of the newborn.

September 16, 2008

Sixth Circuit Recognizes FMLA Retaliation Claim

The Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) contains an anti-discrimination provision that prohibits employers from discriminating against employees “for opposing any practice made unlawful” under the FMLA. However, the text of the FMLA does not contain an express provision that prohibits retaliation against an employee simply for requesting or taking FMLA leave, and aggressive employers have tried to exploit this statutory gap by firing employees for requesting FMLA leave and then arguing that such retaliation is not prohibited under the FMLA.

This attempt was recently rejected by the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals in Bryant v. Dollar General Corp. Although the Sixth Circuit does not have direct authority over the federal courts of Georgia, as the FMLA is a relatively new law and many of its details are still being fleshed out by the courts, it is important for Georgia employees to stay current with FMLA decisions in the other federal courts.

In Bryant, a female employee with diabetes filled out FMLA paperwork requesting a brief leave of absence. However, shortly thereafter, the employer launched disciplinary proceedings against her arising out of an alleged altercation that occurred about a month before the employee requested FMLA leave. The employee then took about a week of FMLA leave and was fired a few weeks later.

In the employee’s subsequent FMLA retaliation lawsuit, the employer argued that neither the text of the FMLA nor its regulations explicitly prohibit retaliation. According to the employer, the statutory language only prohibits discrimination against employees for opposing any practice that is unlawful under the FMLA, and the regulations only prohibit discrimination against employees who have used FMLA leave. The employer thus contended that there is no prohibition against FMLA retaliation.

Continue reading "Sixth Circuit Recognizes FMLA Retaliation Claim" »